作者共發了5篇帖子。 字體大小:較小 - 100% (默認)▼  內容轉換:不轉換▼
 
點擊 回復
265 9
How should we understand the sentence
大魔導士 十七級
1樓 發表于:2025-1-3 22:23
'Being a mum is hard enough without adding more stress'

Understanding one: It's impossible not to add more stress when you are a mum

Understanding two: Being a mum is very hard, so we should not add more stress to ourselves

Which understanding is correct?

大魔導士 十七級
2樓 發表于:2025-1-3 22:23
I have asked the AI, the AI answered:


The correct understanding of the sentence "Being a mum is hard enough without adding more stress" is:

Understanding two: Being a mum is very hard, so we should not add more stress to ourselves.

This interpretation aligns with the overall meaning of the sentence, which emphasizes that the role of being a mother is already challenging enough, and therefore, it is advisable not to exacerbate the situation by introducing additional stress. The phrase "without adding more stress" suggests that the existing level of stress associated with being a mother is sufficient, and there is no need to increase it further.

On the other hand, Understanding one ("It's impossible not to add more stress when you are a mum") twists the meaning of the sentence, implying that adding more stress is inevitable, which is not what the original sentence conveys. The sentence is actually suggesting the opposite: that we should avoid adding more stress to an already demanding role.

 
圆环之理:回复 @啊啊是谁都对:I also have the similar doubt like you, but cannot get the answer
  2025-1-3 23:52 回復
大魔導士 十七級
3樓 發表于:2025-1-3 22:25
I must say AIs have helped me much in the area of English learning
 
大魔導士 十七級
5樓 發表于:2025-1-3 22:36
Previously when I met incomprehensible sentences, I can't find appropriate people to ask, I have to struggle to guess it. So I must say, it's our luck that we have AIs
 

回復帖子

內容:
用戶名: 您目前是匿名發表
驗證碼:
(快捷鍵:Ctrl+Enter)
 

本帖信息

點擊數:265 回複數:9
評論數: ?
作者:圆环之理
最後回復:圆环之理
最後回復時間:2025-1-3 23:52
 
©2010-2025 Purasbar Ver2.0
除非另有聲明,本站採用創用CC姓名標示-相同方式分享 3.0 Unported許可協議進行許可。