Introduction:

This week, we will explore a well-known saying:

"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth writing."

The quote challenges us to think about what we leave behind—whether through our words or our actions. It suggests that to be remembered, we must create something meaningful: ideas that endure in writing, or deeds worth recording.

This raises personal reflections: What do we consider “worth” reading or writing about? Does being remembered matter to everyone? And how does this idea align with our own values and lives? We’ll share our thoughts on whether we agree with this perspective or see it differently.

Subquestions

A. Personal Values and Legacy

1. How important is it to you personally to be remembered after you die? Why or why not?

2. In your own life, do you feel more driven to "write things worth reading" (share ideas) or "do things worth writing" (perform actions)? What shapes this inclination?

3. What does "worth" mean in this context? Who or what defines whether something is "worth reading" or "worth writing" about?

B. Societal and Cultural Perspectives

1. How do societal values and culture influence what is considered a legacy worth remembering? Can you give an example?

2. Does this quote overlook quiet, ordinary, or private contributions that are meaningful but not widely recorded? Should they be valued equally?

3. Who historically gets to be remembered—is it fair? What factors (like power, privilege, or luck) play a role in who is written about?

C. Relevance in the Modern World

1. In the age of social media and digital footprints, has the meaning of "being remembered" changed? How?

2. Does this quote create pressure to achieve grand things, or is it a useful motivator? What might be a healthier way to view it?

3. Can you think of someone who is remembered primarily for their writings, and someone for their deeds? Which form of legacy do you find more compelling, and why?