[3. If somebody doesn't violate these rules, but makes me angry critically, I'll first negotiate with him/her. If negotiation fails, the punishment will be executed]
Question 1: Now that the act doesn't violate any rule, what can justify the punishment when the negotiation fail?
圆环之理：Thank you for your question. After thinking about this question I must say, to be honest now there are not strict criteria to justify such punishment, it only depends on the conscience of every administrator. Some admins could abuse this term and some will restrain themselves. When there are more users in Purasbar, perhaps I will detele this term. And after that every rule will go into effect only after legislation
[1. The primary principle: English only! No Chinese! No other languages!]
If one put a pic that contains other language's content, but the explaination is pure English, does this violate this rule?
圆环之理：Uhhh, after your question I must admit, many laws do have loopholes to exploit. I think it depends on the intention of this netizen. If the intention of this netizen is only to share a picture, but this picture has information of other languages by coincidence, then he/her doesn't violate this rule. But if his/her intention is to exploit loopholes of our rule, then he/her violates this rule. Perhaps you can give us suggestions to distinguish the latter from the former?
